National News Special Report
FRSC HAS NO POWER TO FINE MOTORIST - COURT RULES
![]()
Afnews Editor
Dec 14, 2019
A federal high court in Lagos has declared void powers of the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) to impose fines on motorists for traffic offences.
READ ALSO:
REVEALED: How All Progressives Congress (APC) Played Into The Opposition Hands Ahead Of 2027 - Sumner Sambo Warns
John Tsoho, a judge, held that the commission could not turn itself into a court of law by punishing those who commit traffic offences.
READ ALSO:
"Terrorists Have Outgunned Our Troops" - Ndume Raises Alarm Over Boko Haram War, Sends Urgent Message To Tinubu
Tope Alabi, a lawyer, had approached the court to declare that only a court of competent jurisdiction could pronounce a person guilty under section 10 (4) and 28 (2) of the FRSC Act 2007.
READ ALSO:
Sowore's Miscalculation and the Need to beat a Wise Retreat
Other defendant in the suit was the attorney-general of the federation.
READ ALSO:
Hushpuppi: Group Reveals Why Atiku, Saraki, Dino must be investigated
The judge also awarded N1million damages in favour of the plaintiff because officials of the FRSC had confiscated his vehicle and driver's licence.
READ ALSO:
We are not terrorists: Nigerian Muslim organisation denies link to ISWAP
Tosho said while FRSC was statutorily empowered to arrest and fine traffic offenders, a closer look at the definition of the word "fine" meant a pecuniary criminal punishment or civil penalty payable to the public treasury.
READ ALSO:
Why El-Rufai Was Returned To ICPC Custody?
"In the instant case, however, the involvement of the element of arrest takes the imposition of fine by the FRSC to the realm of criminal punishment," he said.
READ ALSO:
Rivers State Can't Succumb To Secessionist Agenda, Wike Says
"From these definitions, it is obvious that the act of sentencing is a judicial action or exercise, and imposition of fine connotes conviction for an alleged offence.
READ ALSO:
Juventus 2-5 Man City: Pep Guardiola's side produce statement win to top group at Club World Cup
"It is, thus, very clear that the FRSC, not being a court of law, cannot impose fine, especially as it has no powers to conduct trial.
READ ALSO:
Nnamdi Kanu Won't Appear In Court On Oct. 4 - Lawyer Says | READ MORE
"Hence, the exercise of the statutory powers given to the defendant under the Act as pertain to imposition of fine is clearly a usurpation of judicial powers exclusively vested in the courts.
READ ALSO:
Tinubu Breaks Silence on Hardship, Inflation, Power Crisis - Vows Nigeria Will Overcome Economic Storm
"In the circumstances, I endorse the plaintiff's submission that by virtue of section 1(3) of the constitution, the power to impose fine conferred on FRSC by the enabling act is null and void to the extent of its inconsistency with the constitution."
READ ALSO:
I Will Not Allow Criminality As President, Peter Obi Declares
Tsoho held that the FRSC resorted to "legislative absurdity" when it imposed a fine of 3,000 on the plaintiff, rather than the N2,000 statutorily prescribed.
READ ALSO:
FIFA Suspends India Football Federation -READ WHY
"FRSC's function should not go beyond issuance of mere notices of offence," he ruled.
READ ALSO:
REVEALED: How All Progressives Congress (APC) Played Into The Opposition Hands Ahead Of 2027 - Sumner Sambo Warns
"It is a cardinal principle of natural justice that no person can be condemned without being heard.
READ ALSO:
"Terrorists Have Outgunned Our Troops" - Ndume Raises Alarm Over Boko Haram War, Sends Urgent Message To Tinubu
"It is in observance of this that a person alleged to have committed an offence has to respond to such allegation before a court of law during trial."
READ ALSO:
Sowore's Miscalculation and the Need to beat a Wise Retreat
According to the judge, the plaintiff was issued a notice of offence Sheet on April 4, 2013, but FRSC did not take him to court for five months before the plaintiff filed his suit on September 9, 2013.
READ ALSO:
Hushpuppi: Group Reveals Why Atiku, Saraki, Dino must be investigated
"The vital question to ask is how long would it take the FRSC to reasonably commence prosecution of a traffic offence?" he asked.
READ ALSO:
We are not terrorists: Nigerian Muslim organisation denies link to ISWAP
"The plaintiff was not under obligation to wait indefinitely for redress due to FRSC's inaction or laxity.
READ ALSO:
Why El-Rufai Was Returned To ICPC Custody?
"I hold the view that the confiscation of the vehicle was unnecessary in the first place, though the FRSC spiritedly sought to justify it."
READ ALSO:
Rivers State Can't Succumb To Secessionist Agenda, Wike Says
The judge then granted 11 of the 14 reliefs sought by the plaintiff, awarding N1million in his favour instead of the N10 million prayed for.
