Categories
AFNewsNG Logo
National News Special Report

MALABU OIL SCAM: Adoke Floors EFCC, As Court Discharges Ex-AGF | READ WHAT COURT SAID

Afnews Editor

Mar 28, 2024

MALABU OIL SCAM: Adoke Floors EFCC, As Court Discharges Ex-AGF | READ WHAT COURT SAID

READ ALSO: Ataga: How Police Threatened, Tortured Me, Forced Me To Write False Statements - Chidinma Alleges

A Federal Capital Territory, FCT, High Court on Thursday discharged a former Attorney-General of the Federation, AGF, Mohammed Bello Adoke, and six others after dismissing charges filed against them over the controversial Oil Prospecting Licence, OPL, 245, otherwise known as Malabu Oil scam.

READ ALSO: "Terrorists Have Outgunned Our Troops" - Ndume Raises Alarm Over Boko Haram War, Sends Urgent Message To Tinubu

Recall that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, dragged Adoke and other defendants before the court on an amended 40-count charge bordering on disobeying direction of the law, offering and receiving gratification, conspiracy and forgery, among others.

READ ALSO: Tinubu Breaks Silence on Hardship, Inflation, Power Crisis - Vows Nigeria Will Overcome Economic Storm

Adoke, who served as AGF and Minister of Justice under the administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan, was prosecuted by EFCC in the suit marked FCT/HC/CR/151/2020.

READ ALSO: Arsenal Go Seven Points Clear At Top Of Premier League

Other accused persons are Aliyu Abubakar, Rasky Gbinigie, Malabu Oil and Gas Limited, Nigeria Agip Exploration Limited, Shell Nigeria Extra Deep Limited and Shell Nigeria Exploration Production Company Limited.

READ ALSO: Tears in Kano

https://youtu.be/85y0iXeHLBs

READ ALSO: I Will Not Allow Criminality As President, Peter Obi Declares

Ruling on the no-case submission filed by the defendants, Justice Abubakar Kutigi held that any trial processes are evidence driven but the prosecution failed to produce certain documents or call some witnesses to prove its case.

READ ALSO: SAD: Man Confesses To Cooking, Eating Neighbor's Heart | READ DETAILS

He further held that the prosecution has failed to prove the essential elements of the offences the defendants were charged with before the court.

READ ALSO: SUPREME COURT WILL MAKE FINAL DECISION ON ZAMFARA APC - INEC

According to him, though the defendants were constitutionally presumed to be innocent, to establish prima facie case against them, the prosecution had to produce sufficient evidence to warrant the court to call on them to enter their defence.

READ ALSO: Commonwealth Games: Nigeria's Adenike Wins Gold Medal -READ MORE

Justice Kutigi held that in the current case, the prosecution failed to establish any prima facie case against the defendants.

READ ALSO: Why El-Rufai Was Returned To ICPC Custody?

He cited the situation whereby about three counts involved forgery, yet the prosecution failed to tender relevant documents as exhibits.

READ ALSO: Sowore's Miscalculation and the Need to beat a Wise Retreat

The judge further held that a charge must not be filed for the purpose of doing so, submitting that frivolous charge does damage to the judicial system.

READ ALSO: REVEALED: How All Progressives Congress (APC) Played Into The Opposition Hands Ahead Of 2027 - Sumner Sambo Warns

He commended the prosecution counsel for accepting in his final written address that no case has been made by the prosecution against the defendants.

READ ALSO: Ataga: How Police Threatened, Tortured Me, Forced Me To Write False Statements - Chidinma Alleges

https://youtu.be/V_JHYfW2wLE

READ ALSO: "Terrorists Have Outgunned Our Troops" - Ndume Raises Alarm Over Boko Haram War, Sends Urgent Message To Tinubu

Justice Kutigi, however, lamented that it took the prosecution four years before realising it.

READ ALSO: Tinubu Breaks Silence on Hardship, Inflation, Power Crisis - Vows Nigeria Will Overcome Economic Storm

"The defendants ought not to have been charged in the first instance.

READ ALSO: Arsenal Go Seven Points Clear At Top Of Premier League

"This, stemmed from the fact that the prosecution failed to produce before the court the minimum evidence to enable the court to order the defendants to enter their defence," he said.

Related Stories

""

— Afnews Editor

Join the Conversation

Signed in as Member