Why Kalu's Law Licence Is Under Fire: NYSC-Law School Overlap Petition Rocks Deputy Speaker | READ DETAILS

A fresh legal controversy has erupted around the Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Hon. Benjamin Okezie Kalu, following a petition challenging the legality of his enrolment as a legal practitioner and the authenticity of his participation in the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC).

According to a report by thenigerialawyer.com, a former First Vice President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Mr. John Aikpokpo-Martins, has formally petitioned the Legal Practitioners' Disciplinary Committee (LPDC), alleging what he described as "fraudulent enrolmentÔÇØ on the Roll of Legal Practitioners maintained at the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

At the centre of the petition is an alleged overlap between Kalu's NYSC service year and his attendance at the Nigerian Law School, Enugu Campus.

The petitioner contends that Kalu was mobilised for NYSC from March 9, 2010 to March 8, 2011, while simultaneously attending the Nigerian Law School between April 23, 2010 and July 1, 2011.

Aikpokpo-Martins argues that such dual participation would contravene Section 2(3) of the NYSC Act, which mandates a continuous one-year national service. He maintains that it is "statutorily impossibleÔÇØ for a corps member to lawfully undertake full-time academic training during the subsistence of the service year.

The petition further references what is described as a strict policy of the Nigerian Law School and the Council of Legal Education prohibiting students from serving in the NYSC during their period of study.

In an affidavit deposed before the LPDC, the petitioner alleges that Kalu-who reportedly enrolled at the Law School under the name Benjamin Okezie Osisiogu before subsequent changes of name-made a formal declaration on April 23, 2010, affirming that he was not and would not engage in employment or serve in the NYSC during his course of study.

However, documentary evidence attached to the petition, including NYSC Certificate of National Service No. A001773067 allegedly issued on March 8, 2011, is said to indicate continuous participation in the scheme within the same timeframe.

The petitioner asserts that this raises fundamental questions as to whether the Deputy Speaker satisfied the mandatory 70 percent attendance requirement at the Nigerian Law School-a prerequisite for certification by the Council of Legal Education and subsequent Call to Bar.

Kalu was called to the Nigerian Bar on September 6, 2011, and enrolled at the Supreme Court with enrolment number SCN/078630.

The petition invokes several provisions of the NYSC Act, including Sections 13(1)(b), 13(3), and 13(4), which prescribe penalties for failure to serve continuously, aiding contraventions, or making false statements in connection with the scheme.

Under Section 11(1)(c) of the Legal Practitioners Act, the LPDC is empowered to discipline any legal practitioner found guilty of infamous conduct in a professional respect.

Aikpokpo-Martins has also written to the Director-General of the NYSC, urging the withdrawal of the alleged Certificate of National Service and calling for prosecution if breaches are established.

He further disclosed plans to apply for subpoenas compelling the production of official records from both the NYSC and the Nigerian Law School, including call-up letters, attendance registers, allowance payment records, and discharge documentation.

The petitioner insists that the matter transcends politics and strikes at the core of professional ethics and institutional integrity.

"The exalted position he presently occupies must showcase the highest standards of integrity, transparency and adherence to the law,ÔÇØ he stated.

Senior lawyers who spoke on the development emphasised that the LPDC possesses jurisdiction to investigate allegations of professional misconduct, including fraudulent enrolment, where properly substantiated. However, they cautioned that the claims remain allegations pending formal inquiry and evidentiary scrutiny.

As of press time, there has been no official response from Hon. Kalu regarding the petitions. Neither the NYSC nor the LPDC has publicly confirmed whether investigations have commenced.

The unfolding controversy places renewed focus on statutory compliance, professional standards, and the expectations of integrity for holders of high public office.