The Federal Government has proposed N135.22 billion in the 2026 budget for electoral adjudication and post-election matters, highlighting anticipated costs tied to election-related legal processes.
READ ALSO:
World Development Information Day 2025: How Dr. Chima Desmond Anyaso Exemplifies Forgiveness, Service, and Gratitude
The provision, contained in the House of Representatives Order Paper of March 31, 2026, forms part of the 2026 Appropriation Bill. It falls under the Service-Wide Votes, a centrally managed fund used to cover obligations not assigned to specific ministries, departments, or agencies. The allocation relates to expected legal disputes, settlements, and administrative processes linked to elections.
READ ALSO:
Nigeria: Supreme Court Set to Decide ADC Leadership Battle | SEE DATE
Analysis of the budget document shows the provision is included within the Consolidated Revenue Fund charges, which total N3.70 trillion, with the electoral adjudication component accounting for about 3.65 per cent of that segment. The allocation comes alongside a proposed N1.01 trillion statutory transfer to the Independent National Electoral Commission (
INEC), which represents 21 per cent of total statutory transfers.
READ ALSO:
ADC Crisis: Nwosu Links INEC Decision to Jagaban Politics | READ WHY
Earlier projections by
INEC indicated a requirement of N873.78 billion to conduct the 2027 general elections, alongside N171 billion for its 2026 operations, reflecting a significant increase compared to funding for the 2023 elections.
READ ALSO:
UKOHA: Again, Lawmaker Distributes Cash Awards To Less Privileged/Petty Traders In Arochukwu | SEE PHOTOS
The proposed allocation has drawn reactions from opposition parties and civil society organisations, who questioned its size and implications.
READ ALSO:
Benue North-East: I will be running for Senate in 2027 - Suswam
The Peoples Democratic Party National Publicity Secretary, Ini Ememobong, said:
"It means that
INEC itself is anticipating that it will not do well and that people will not accept the outcome of the results. Because if
INEC becomes very transparent, post-election litigation will be reduced drastically. It is the lack of transparency and the obvious opacity of
INEC during elections that result in post-election litigation.
READ ALSO:
ADC crisis: Tinubu, Amupitan working to destroy opposition, democracy - Atiku's aide
"However,
INEC, in every election, is meant to be neutral. So I am wondering what they are funding.ÔÇØ
READ ALSO:
Yusuf Buhari Declares Interest In House Of Representatives Seat -
Also reacting, the African Democratic Congress Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, acknowledged the need for preparation but questioned the scale of the allocation, noting concerns about accountability and expected litigation levels.
READ ALSO:
IPOB ACTIVITIES IN EBONYI IS GETTING OUT OF HAND, UMAHI CRIES OUT
Political economist, Prof Pat Utomi, said:
"It is not the Federal Government that goes to elections, it is the individual candidates, so why should the Federal Government have a budget for it? They should not.ÔÇØ
READ ALSO:
Olawepo-Hashim Resigns From PDP, Vows To Resist One Party State -
He added:
"If the budget is for
INEC, then it should be in the
INEC budget, not the FG's budget. Although the budget process in Nigeria is broken and has been a pure mess,ÔÇØ
READ ALSO:
AMINA ZAKARI REVEALS HOW SHE IS RELATED TO PRESIDENT BUHARI, READ
Human rights lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN), also criticised the provision, stating:
"It is on the very high side. Apart from the fact that
INEC has its legal department that services all its offices in the 36 states of the Federation,
INEC does not pay more than N3m per brief, even to a senior advocate. This is due to the fact that
INEC maintains a neutral position in the majority of pre-election cases.ÔÇØ
READ ALSO:
I Am A Youth Capable Of Making Nigeria Great-Tinubu Boasts | READ DETAILS
He added:
"In 2023,
INEC was joined as a party in less than 3,500 pre-election cases, election petitions, and appeals arising from them,ÔÇØ
READ ALSO:
Why Nigerians didn't value Jonathan - Ndume | READ DETAILS
"With the ouster of the jurisdiction of the courts in the internal affairs of political parties, the number of pre-election cases will be substantially reduced, and if
INEC conducts credible elections, there may be few election petitions and appeals,ÔÇØ
READ ALSO:
World Development Information Day 2025: How Dr. Chima Desmond Anyaso Exemplifies Forgiveness, Service, and Gratitude
"Altogether,
INEC may not spend up to N20 billion on election legal battles,ÔÇØ
READ ALSO:
Nigeria: Supreme Court Set to Decide ADC Leadership Battle | SEE DATE
Civil society groups also raised concerns over the implication of the allocation. The Executive Director of #FixPolitics Africa, Anthony Ubani, said:
"The N135.22bn allocation for post-election legal battles is a troubling signal about the state of our democracyÔÇØ.
READ ALSO:
ADC Crisis: Nwosu Links INEC Decision to Jagaban Politics | READ WHY
He added:
"Yes, electoral disputes are normal, and the judiciary must be funded. But when a country begins to budget this heavily for post-election litigation, it suggests that elections are no longer expected to be trusted; they are expected to be contested.
READ ALSO:
UKOHA: Again, Lawmaker Distributes Cash Awards To Less Privileged/Petty Traders In Arochukwu | SEE PHOTOS
"A credible electoral system should settle outcomes at the ballot box, not in the courtroom. But in Nigeria, elections are increasingly fought in three stages: primaries, voting day, and then the tribunal. This weakens public confidence and shifts the real battleground away from the people,ÔÇØ
READ ALSO:
Benue North-East: I will be running for Senate in 2027 - Suswam
"When politicians believe the final outcome will be decided in court, compliance drops, manipulation increases, and the system begins to reward strategy over integrity. Instead of fixing the root causes, weak electoral laws, poor transparency, weak enforcement, and flawed processes, we are budgeting to manage the consequences. That is backward.ÔÇØ
READ ALSO:
ADC crisis: Tinubu, Amupitan working to destroy opposition, democracy - Atiku's aide
Other stakeholders, including Debo Adeniran of the Centre for Anti-Corruption and Open Leadership, and Auwal Rafsanjani of the Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre, also questioned the rationale behind the allocation, stressing the need for electoral transparency and efficient use of public funds.
READ ALSO:
Yusuf Buhari Declares Interest In House Of Representatives Seat -
They maintained that credible elections would significantly reduce post-election litigation and associated costs, while urging authorities to prioritise reforms that strengthen trust in the electoral process.
READ ALSO:
IPOB ACTIVITIES IN EBONYI IS GETTING OUT OF HAND, UMAHI CRIES OUT
READ ALSO:
Olawepo-Hashim Resigns From PDP, Vows To Resist One Party State -
