Why DSS Is Re-Arraigning Sowore: Inside the Fresh Cyberstalking Charges, Court Drama, and What It Means for Free Speech
Afnews Editor
Jan 19, 2026
Why DSS has re-arraigned Omoyele Sowore on fresh cyberstalking charges, why the court removed Meta and X, and why the trial was stalled. Read full details on All Facts Newspaper.
https://youtu.be/kkvKexGlo-M
The re-arraignment of activist and former presidential candidate, Omoyele Sowore, by the Department of State Services (DSS) has reignited national debate over free speech, cybercrime laws, and the limits of political criticism in Nigeria.
On Monday, Justice Mohammed Umar of the Federal High Court, Abuja, formally re-arraigned Sowore on amended cyberstalking charges, while striking out Meta Platforms Inc. and X Corp. as co-defendants in the case.
The DSS, through its counsel Akinlolu Kehinde, SAN, withdrew the two foreign tech companies from the charge, prompting the court to remove their names in a brief ruling. The development cleared the path for a fresh prosecution focused solely on Sowore.
READ ALSO: Political Tensions Soar as Rivers Assembly Factions Hold Parallel Sessions
The amended charge, filed on December 5, 2025, accuses Sowore of cyberstalking and defamation under the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) (Amendment) Act, 2024, for social media posts in which he referred to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as a "criminalÔÇØ following the President's comments on corruption during a trip to Brazil.
According to the prosecution, Sowore knowingly posted the statements on his X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook handles with the intention of causing a breakdown of law and order and posing a threat to public peace.
READ ALSO: Ex Akwa Ibom SSG, Obong Umana Replaces Akpabio | READ DETAILS
Sowore pleaded not guilty to the two-count charge when it was read in court.
READ ALSO: Sowore's Miscalculation and the Need to beat a Wise Retreat
However, the trial could not commence after Sowore's counsel, Abubakar Marshall, raised a strong objection, arguing that the prosecution failed to attach the names and identities of witnesses to the proof of evidence, a requirement under the law.
READ ALSO: I Will Not Allow Criminality As President, Peter Obi Declares
Marshall told the court that the omission violated Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution, which guarantees the right to fair hearing, insisting that Sowore could not prepare a proper defence without knowing the witnesses against him.
READ ALSO: THE BIG STORY: Sen. Kalu Storms Abia State, Defiling COVID-19 Protocol; Nigerians React |WATCH VIDEO
Justice Umar agreed and ordered the DSS to comply fully, directing the prosecution to list all witnesses, disclose their particulars, and provide all necessary documents to the defence before the next hearing.
READ ALSO: To Survive Daily In Nigeria Is A Miracle - Anglican Bishop Reveals Why
The case has now been adjourned to January 22, when trial is expected to begin, provided the prosecution meets the court's directive.
READ ALSO: ATIKU VS WIKE: BoT Chairman Reveals Why PDP Chairman Ayu Have To Step Down
If convicted, Sowore faces a penalty of at least 15 million fine or five years imprisonment, under the amended cybercrime law.
READ ALSO: Why El-Rufai Was Returned To ICPC Custody?
Beyond the courtroom, the re-arraignment has intensified public scrutiny of the cyberstalking provisions of the law, with critics warning that it could be used to criminalise dissent and political speech, especially in the age of social media activism.
Related Stories
REVEALED: How All Progressives Congress (APC) Played Into The Opposition Hands Ahead Of 2027 - Sumner Sambo Warns
I Will Not Allow Criminality As President, Peter Obi Declares
Why El-Rufai Was Returned To ICPC Custody?
Sowore's Miscalculation and the Need to beat a Wise Retreat
Tinubu Breaks Silence on Hardship, Inflation, Power Crisis - Vows Nigeria Will Overcome Economic Storm
"Terrorists Have Outgunned Our TroopsÔÇØ - Ndume Raises Alarm Over Boko Haram War, Sends Urgent Message To Tinubu
""
— Afnews Editor