Why PDP can suspend, expel Wike - Court explains
Thompson Nsisongabasi
Jun 01, 2023
A Federal High Court in Abuja told former Governor of Rivers, Nyesom Wike, on Wednesday that the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has the right to suspend or expel him if the action is done in accordance with the law.
READ ALSO: Nigeria Budgets N135bn For 2027 Election Lawsuits -
Justice James Omotosho stated this in a judgement he delivered on a suit filed by Wike prior to the 2023 general elections to seek a court order to stop the PDP from taking action against him without a fair hearing.
READ ALSO: BREAKING: Okada Riders Clash With Police In Lagos
The press reports that the ex-governor had sued the PDP, its National Working Committee (NWC), and its National Executive Committee (NEC) as 1st to 3rd respondents.
READ ALSO: Ikpeazu Salutes Ebitu Ukiwe At 81, Describes Him As "An Authentic Nigerian Elder Statesman"
Wike, in the suit (FHC/ABJ/CS/139/2023) dated and filed Feb. 2 by his lawyer, Joshua Musa, SAN, also joined the National Chairman of PDP, Dr Iyorchia Ayu, National Secretary of PDP, Senator Samuel Anyanwu, and the Independent National Electoral Commission as 4th to 6th respondents, respectively.
READ ALSO: Benue North-East: I will be running for Senate in 2027 - Suswam
He had prayed for an order directing all parties to maintain the status quo and stay all actions in the matter relating to the threat to suspend or expel him by the 1st to 5th respondents pending the hearing and determination of the originating motion.
READ ALSO: How Yah00 B0y used his granny to beg white client for money via video call (Watch)
Wike asked the court to enforce his fundamental right to freedom of association, which was allegedly about to be breached by the respondents.
READ ALSO: Buratai: We Have Defeated Insurgency, But Facing the Challenge of Terrorism
But the PDP, through its lawyer, Johnson Usman, SAN, disagreed with Wike's submission.
READ ALSO: Bill Gates Opens Up On What He Discussed With Tinubu During His Visit | READ DETAILS
Usman argued that the case was only based on speculation, as Wike had failed to provide any evidence to substantiate that the respondents intended to suspend or expel him from the party.
READ ALSO: ABIA [Charity Work]: Seadogs Umuahia Visit Ezeleke Community Primary School |SEE PHOTOS
He said the party had not contemplated suspending or expelling members of the G5 Governors or the Integrity Group, despite engaging in anti-party activities.
READ ALSO: Olawepo-Hashim Resigns From PDP, Vows To Resist One Party State -
Usman said Wike and four other governors engaged in anti-party activities by forming the Integrity Group and campaigning for another presidential candidate in the Feb. 25 election.
READ ALSO: Yusuf Buhari Declares Interest In House Of Representatives Seat -
The senior lawyer argued that a member who voluntarily joined an association must abide by its rules.
READ ALSO: ADC Crisis: Nwosu Links INEC Decision to Jagaban Politics | READ WHY
Usman, who argued that the ex-governor must have exhausted the internal mechanisms of the party first, said the court lacked the jurisdiction to entertain the matter, which, he said, was only within the realm of conjuncture.
READ ALSO: Nigeria: Supreme Court Set to Decide ADC Leadership Battle | SEE DATE
He further argued that it was not enough for Wike to institute the suit on fundamental rights enforcement grounds.
READ ALSO: Nigeria Budgets N135bn For 2027 Election Lawsuits -
Justice Omotosho had, on Feb. 2, given an interim order against the party and others listed in the face of Wike's ex-parte motion.
READ ALSO: BREAKING: Okada Riders Clash With Police In Lagos
The judge, who extended the restraining order on Feb. 14, held that all parties should maintain a status quo pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
READ ALSO: Ikpeazu Salutes Ebitu Ukiwe At 81, Describes Him As "An Authentic Nigerian Elder Statesman"
Delivering judgement on Wednesday, Justice Omotosho said the court had considered the processes filed by parties and the arguments of counsel.
READ ALSO: Benue North-East: I will be running for Senate in 2027 - Suswam
He held that suspending or expelling the applicant without affording him the right to defend himself would breach his fundamental rights as enshrined in the party's and Nigeria's constitutions.
READ ALSO: How Yah00 B0y used his granny to beg white client for money via video call (Watch)
Omotosho said that though the party had the right to suspend or expel its members, this must be done in compliance with its own laws.
READ ALSO: Buratai: We Have Defeated Insurgency, But Facing the Challenge of Terrorism
The judge said that though Section 46(1) of the law vested jurisdiction on the court if one's rights had been breached, he said the court would not dabble into the internal affairs of any political party, except where the rights of a member had been violated by the party without recourse to its own laws.
READ ALSO: Bill Gates Opens Up On What He Discussed With Tinubu During His Visit | READ DETAILS
According to him, fundamental human rights are rights enshrined in the Constitution of Nigeria and are sacrosanct.
READ ALSO: ABIA [Charity Work]: Seadogs Umuahia Visit Ezeleke Community Primary School |SEE PHOTOS
"Where this right ought to be enforced, the court will do everything within its reach to ensure this. However, as fundamental and sacrosanct these rights are, they are not absolute," he said.
READ ALSO: Olawepo-Hashim Resigns From PDP, Vows To Resist One Party State -
Justice Omotosho, therefore, agreed that any member of a political party who appeared before a disciplinary committee should be given the opportunity to defend himself.
READ ALSO: Yusuf Buhari Declares Interest In House Of Representatives Seat -
"If not, any decision taken shall be null and void," he said.
READ ALSO: ADC Crisis: Nwosu Links INEC Decision to Jagaban Politics | READ WHY
He added: "This court is convinced that the applicant is entitled to a fair hearing and that the respondent also has the right to discipline its members in accordance with the law."
READ ALSO: Nigeria: Supreme Court Set to Decide ADC Leadership Battle | SEE DATE
The judge further said that Wike had the right to associate and that the threat to dismiss him without inviting him to defend himself contravened Article 57 (1) (2) of the party.
READ ALSO: Nigeria Budgets N135bn For 2027 Election Lawsuits -
He said that the party's national chairman, Dr Iyorchia Ayu, and his agents were bound to promote constitutional democracy.
Related Stories
Nigeria: Supreme Court Set to Decide ADC Leadership Battle | SEE DATE
Benue North-East: I will be running for Senate in 2027 - Suswam
ADC Crisis: Nwosu Links INEC Decision to Jagaban Politics | READ WHY
Yusuf Buhari Declares Interest In House Of Representatives Seat -
Nigeria Budgets N135bn For 2027 Election Lawsuits -
Olawepo-Hashim Resigns From PDP, Vows To Resist One Party State -
""
— Thompson Nsisongabasi